Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
JDB-Journal of Dental Biomaterials. 2016; 3 (2): 248-253
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-180273

ABSTRACT

Statement of Problem: As a physical property, wear resistance of the materials used in the fabrication of orthodontic retainers play a significant role in the stability and long term use of the appliances


Objectives: To evaluate the wear resistance of two commonly used materials for orthodontic retainers: Acropars OP, i.e. a polymethyl methacrylate based material, and 3A-GS060, i.e. a polyethylene based material


Materials and Methods: For each material, 30 orthodontic retainers were made according to the manufacturers' instructions and a 30×30×2 mm block was cut out from the mid- palatal area of each retainer. Each specimen underwent 1000 cycles of wear stimulation in a pin on disc machine. The depth of wear of each specimen was measured using a Nano Wizard II atomic force microscope in 3 random points of each specimen's wear trough. The average of these three measurements was calculated and considered as mean value wear depth of each specimen [micro m]


Results: The mean wear depth was 6.10micro m and 2.15micro m for 3A-GS060 and Acropars OP groups respectively. Independent t-test showed a significant difference between the two groups [p < 0.001]. The results show Polymethyl methacrylate base [Acropars] is more wear resistance than the polyethylene based material [3A-GS060]


Conclusions: As the higher wear resistance of the fabrication material can improve the retainers' survival time and its cost-effectiveness, VFRs should be avoided in situations that the appliance needs high wear resistance such as bite blocks opposing occlusal forces


Subject(s)
Orthodontic Retainers , Dental Materials , Materials Testing , Vacuum
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL